Carbon Footprint Explained: From Causes to Solutions

Carbon Footprint Explained: From Causes to Solutions

More and more businesses and investors are seeking to precisely measure corporate CO2 footprints. One of the main drivers behind this movement is new regulatory requirements aimed at containing climate change and minimizing climate-related risks. Read below about what the term “CO2 footprint” means and what factors need to be taken into account when calculating it.

Measuring and reducing CO2 footprints is crucial to mitigating the greenhouse effect and global warming. If CO2 continues to be emitted unabated, environmental problems such as extreme weather events and long-term ecological changes will continue to worsen, posing ever greater risks to our planet and society.

What’s a CO2 Footprint?

A CO2 footprint measures the greenhouse gas emissions caused by a person, company, or product. Those emissions consist primarily of carbon dioxide (CO2), but also contain other greenhouse gases such as methane, nitrous oxide, and fluorinated gases, which get converted into CO2 equivalents to calculate the total emissions load. A corporation’s CO2 footprint thus reflects the sum total of how much the company contributes to climate change through its business operations and its supply chains and through the use of its products.

What Does a Large CO2 Footprint Mean?

A large CO2 footprint can be indicative, for example, of a heavy dependence on fossil fuels. Industries like the energy and transportation sectors often have big footprints for this reason. However, having a large CO2 footprint compared to that of competitors can also be an indication of inefficient processes that result in the wasting of energy or heat, for instance.

How Is a CO2 Footprint Calculated?

Scientific guidelines provide a framework for calculating emissions, and the Greenhouse Gas Protocol sets an internationally established standard. Companies calculate their respective CO2 footprints by identifying all of their sources of emissions, such as natural resource and energy consumption or waste production, and convert them into CO2 equivalents by applying standardized emission factors. Avoided emissions, such as through a company’s own renewable electricity production via solar panels, for example, are also factored into the calculation.

The calculation draws a distinction between a company’s Scope 1, Scope 2, and Scope 3 emissions sources.

+
-

What’s the Difference between Scope 1, 2, and 3 Emissions?

Companies have to understand the different types of emissions from Scope 1 to 3 to effectively utilize CO2 footprint data:

  1. Scope 1: Direct Emissions
    Scope 1 covers direct emissions from sources controlled by a given company, such as emissions caused by fuel consumption by the company’s own vehicle fleet.
  2. Scope 2: Indirect Emissions
    Scope 2 covers indirect emissions resulting from the energy that a company purchases. Some examples are electricity consumption in company buildings and plants, but also energy for heating and cooling if it is not produced by the company itself.
  3. Scope 3: Indirect Emissions
    Scope 3 covers all other indirect emissions that occur along a company’s value chain, such as emissions originating at suppliers and through the use and disposal of a company’s products. For many service enterprises, Scope 3 emissions predominate and account for well over 90% of their total emissions.
Show More
Show Less

Emission categories according to GHG Protocol

Why Are CO2 Footprints Important in the Finance Sector?

Understanding a company’s CO2 footprint is becoming increasingly important for investors and finance experts for three reasons:

  1. Regulatory pressure: Governments and legislators are tightening emissions rules. Companies with a large CO2 footprint run the risk of facing higher taxes, stricter regulations, or even fines or penalties that could impair their profitability.
  2. Reputation risk: Public awareness about environmental issues is growing. Companies with high emissions but with no plans to reduce them run an increasing risk of harming their reputation, which could lead to a loss of customers and sales revenue and could cause their stock prices to fall.
  3. Investment performance: Many investors by now are taking ESG (environmental, social, and corporate governance) factors into account. Companies with smaller CO2 footprints and those on a credible path toward reducing emissions are considered more sustainable and resilient. This, in turn, can translate into a better long-term investment performance. In the B2B space, mounting pressure can be exerted on companies to reduce their CO₂ and ecological footprint. That pressure gets passed on along the entire supply chain as business partners place ever greater emphasis on sustainability. Companies that do not reduce their own footprints risk getting cut off from new business orders.

What’s Problematic about CO2 Footprint Calculators?

CO2 footprint calculators often have limited accuracy because they are based on general assumptions and averages that do not reflect an individual person’s or company’s specific circumstances and emissions sources. They often do not factor in every source of emissions, particularly Scope 3 emissions. Moreover, their methodologies may vary from one another and can deviate from internationally proven models, resulting in footprint mapping inconsistencies.

How can permanent emissions reductions be achieved despite the inaccuracies of CO2 footprint calculators? This is where scientifically grounded approaches like the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) come into play. The SBTi provides companies with a clear framework with which to set emissions-cutting targets aligned with the goals of the Paris Agreement on climate protection, ensuring that emissions reductions strategies not only bring about near-term improvements, but also contribute in the long run to containing global warming.

The Science behind the SBTi

The SBTi is a global framework that helps companies set explicit, scientifically grounded targets for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in accordance with the goals of the Paris Agreement. By aligning their emissions-cutting strategies with the latest climate science insights, corporations can prove their commitment to limiting global warming to much less than 2°C and ideally to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels. Targets validated by the SBTi provide investors with a reliable indicator of the long-term path of a company’s CO2 reduction strategy. An SBTi target thus mainly expresses two things: that a company is taking responsibility and reducing its contribution to climate change, and that it is optimizing its own processes and costs, which can lessen climate-related risks in some circumstances, such as by purchasing from suppliers that do not produce in regions with scarce water resources, for example.